(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the bugzilla web interface). On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:28:00 GMT bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14586 > > Summary: bridge on bonding interface: DHCP replies don't get > through > Product: Networking > Version: 2.5 > Kernel Version: 2.6.31.5 > Platform: All > OS/Version: Linux > Tree: Mainline > Status: NEW > Severity: normal > Priority: P1 > Component: Other > AssignedTo: acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > ReportedBy: harald.dunkel@xxxxxxxxxxx > Regression: No > > > I would like to run a bridge for kvm on a bonding interface (4 * 1Gbit, Intel > e1000e). Problem: The DHCPDISCOVER packets sent by the guest show up on my dhcp > server as expected, but the DHCPOFFER sent as a reply doesn't reach the guest > behind the bridge. > > Using tcpdump on host and guest I can see the DHCPOFFER on the bond0 and br0 > interface, but it never shows up on vnet0 or on the guest's eth0. > > If I drop the bonding interface and use the host's eth2 for the bridge instead, > then there is no such problem. > > Kernel on host and guest is 2.6.31.5. Attached you can find more information > about my setup. > > I had sent this information to the linux kvm mailing list before, but consensus > was that this is a bridging problem. See > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg25153.html > > There was no reply on the linux bridge mailing list, see > > > https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/bridge/2009-November/006749.html _______________________________________________ Bridge mailing list Bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge
