Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > Simon Barber <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 22/08/2009 19:12:10: >> Looking through B.1.3 it looks like the patch would need some >> enhancement. It provides a good basis - handling tagging/untagging and >> filtering, but would need a way to specify the untagged vlan separately >> for in and out. > > I see. Perhaps the VLAN maintainer(CC:ed) can comment too. Especially about extending > the VLAN code to allowed several VLANs in one interface? Just accepting additional VIDs on one VLAN device should be a relatively trivial change, all you need to do is call vlan_group_set_device() with the additional VIDs. I'd suggest to add something similar to the QoS-mapping lists in vlan_netlink.c for the additional VIDs. _______________________________________________ Bridge mailing list Bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge
