richardvoigt@xxxxxxxxx schreef:
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Nicolas de
Pesloüan <nicolas.2p.debian@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
Ok, now we understand what you are trying to do. In particular, I assume
the DHCP server is on the subnet of location B (or behind a router
connected on this subnet), so the expected DHCP offer will come from the
wire interface (eth0) and definitely not from the wireless interface
(eth1).
Looking at "router" in the provided diagram, plus the placement
of A and B, I am led to believe that location A is the primary network
providing DHCP and outbound access. Furthermore, Jochen was getting a
DHCP assignment over his wireless interface before he tried to enable
bridging.
Your suggestion of configuration as a router could work. But
NAT would not if A is the primary location, because the printer would
no longer have a address visible to location A.
Indeed, location A is my primary network which provides DHCP.
And yes, you are correct with your last sentence. The printer should be
visible for location A too :-)
|
_______________________________________________
Bridge mailing list
Bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge
