>If the driver was open source and in one of the standard distributions, it could be reviewed. But since you are on an >older kernel with a non-standard driver there really isn't a lot of interest on my part to help. Sorry. That's fine and thanks for guiding till now. But, Please look at this case once: Now each of ports are attached to there own bridge instead of one, and when I route traffic from one host to other, We will never face this problem. root@none:/$ brctl addbr br-lan1 root@none:/$ brctl addif br-lan1 eth0.0 root@none:/$ brctl stp br-lan1 on root@none:/$ brctl addbr br-lan2 root@none:/$ brctl addif br-lan2 eth0.1 root@none:/$ brctl stp br-lan2 on root@none:/$ brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces br-lan1 8000.001570d8d8fd yes eth0.0 br-lan2 8000.001570d8d8fd yes eth0.1 In this case, even if I send huge traffic the throughput is decreased but device is not going out of memory. Hence I feel there is some leak in bridge instead of driver root@OpenWrt:/$ brctl --version bridge-utils, 1.0.6. If possible, please check this. Thanks, Sharad. -----Original Message----- From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:shemminger@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 10:08 AM To: Tekale Sharad-FHJN78 Cc: bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Out of memory problem On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:10:01 +0800 "Tekale Sharad-FHJN78" <FHJN78@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > What network device driver, that is probably the problem? > We are using Openwrt on our AP, and the driver is mvswitch.c its an > marvell driver. > > If possible, can you point me to some piece of code in the driver to > check for memory leak? > > Thanks Again, > Sharad. If the driver was open source and in one of the standard distributions, it could be reviewed. But since you are on an older kernel with a non-standard driver there really isn't a lot of interest on my part to help. Sorry. _______________________________________________ Bridge mailing list Bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge
