On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 19:33:04 +0100 Jiri Pirko <jpirko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi all. > > This is only a draft of patch to consult. I'm aware that it should be divided > into multiple patches. I want to know opinion from you folks. > > The problem is described in following bugzilla: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487763 > > Basically here's what's going on. In every mode, bonding interface uses the same > mac address for all enslaved devices. Except for mode balance-alb. When you put > this kind of bond device into a bridge it will only add one of mac adresses into > a hash list of mac addresses, say X. This mac address is marked as local. But > this bonding interface also has mac address Y. Now then packet arrives with > destination address Y, this address is not marked as local and the packed looks > like it needs to be forwarded. This packet is then lost which is wrong. > > Notice that interfaces can be added and removed from bond while it is in bridge. > Therefore I introduce another function pointer in struct net_device_ops - > ndo_check_mac_address. This function when it's implemented should check passed > mac address against the one set in device. I'm using this in bonding driver when > the bond is in mode balance-alb to walk thru all slaves and checking if any of > them equals passed address. > > Then in bridge function br_handle_frame_finish() I'm using ndo_check_mac_address > to recognize the destination mac address as local. > > Please look at this and tell me what you think about it. > > Thanks > > Jirka > A better and more general way to do this have the dev_set_mac_address function check the return of the notifier and unwind. Then any protocol can easily prevent address from changing. _______________________________________________ Bridge mailing list Bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge