On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 09:47:58AM (GMT+0800), Lv Zheng wrote: > +---------------------------+-----------------+ > | br0 | br1 | > +------------------+--------------------------+ > | bond0.1 | eth2.1 | eth3.2 | eth4.2 | > +------------------+--------+--------+--------+ > | bond0 | eth2 | eth3 | eth4 | > +---------+--------+ | | | > | eth0 | eth1 | | | | > +---------+--------+--------+--------+--------+ > > It looks good for port based VLAN. Thanks. For port based VLAN, I think it should rather simply be : +---------------------------+-----------------+ | br0 | br1 | +------------------+--------+--------+--------+ | bond0 | eth2 | eth3 | eth4 | +---------+--------+ | | | | eth0 | eth1 | | | | +---------+--------+--------+--------+--------+ without the VLAN layer, otherwise packets will be tagged. -- Boris Dorès _______________________________________________ Bridge mailing list Bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge
