Re: brctl project

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 3 Dec 2008 18:47:14 +0100Christian Salgado González <chrisalga@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi Stephen,> > My name is Christian Salgado, I am studying computer engeneering, this is my last year and I am doing my final Project.> I have sent you a previous email, but I think that you have not understood my problem. I will try to explain you: > (3 pcs)> I have a Pc,called "switch" running brctl(3 interfaces: 2 ethernet and one wifi card, ath0, using Mafwifi). > Other Pc,called client Pc, with two interfaces(wlan0 and eth0),at this computer I have ifenslave bounding both interfaces. > A pc called server.> When I send a media stream from the server to the client, through the switch(brctl), Ifenslave makes load balancing (mode 0 is the only one which I am able to use). To know when ifenslave change the operation interface I have used wireshark. It is very simply, when the client receive a ping request ifenslave answer it one time on eth0 and the next on wlan0.  Then brctl learn which is the interface to forward the data.> > I think that changing the interface sending a ping is not a good way of doing things. This is the reason why I am writing to you.> Please, correct me if I am wrong, but I think that brctl join the interfaces assigning the same port number  to both interfaces.>   1     00:11:22:33:44:55       yes                0.00>   1     00:aa:ff:ff:ff:ff       no                 5.81
Two interfaces should never have same port number (at least as far as bridge isconcerned).
>   2     00:11:11:11:11:11       yes                0.00>  > > For example in the previous table there is a connection between the 2 first interfaces.> > Could be possible change the port number of   00:aa:....:ff   to 2 ? 
Port number only matters to STP, which you probably are not using.  > > In that case it will be on the same network as 00:11...:11,  isn't it??
Two active interfaces on same network with bridge is equivalent to forwardingloop. You need to run STP, and have only one active interface.
> I have been looking at the code of brtcl and I have found the struc fdb. What do you think that it is the best way of doing it??> 
Yes you can go do what you want with the code, but this is really oneof those: "I think I can hack the bridge code to do my own personalidea of special case routing"
My answer to this is: "have fun, tell us what you find out, don't expect any support"_______________________________________________Bridge mailing listBridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [AoE Tools]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]

  Powered by Linux