Re: [RFC] bridge: STP timer management range checking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > Seems bogus extra code to me - stops things working that should be
> > allowed too.
> >   
> The timer configuration is propagated in network protocol, so 
> misconfigured Linux box
> could survive but effect other devices on the network that are less 
> robust. Maybe the

That would be irrelevant. CAP_NET_ADMIN lets you make that size mess
anyway.

> small values would cause some other bridge to crash, go infinite loop, ...
> More likely robust devices might ignore our packets (because values out 
> of range), leading to
> routing loops and other disasters.

Spamming tree isn't secure, news at 11.

> The kernel does need to stop administrative settings from taking out a 
> network. 

If you have CAP_NET_ADMIN you can trivially take out the network unless
it is properly switched.

Now you might want your pretty little GUI and/or config tools to warn
people that their configuration is outside 802 specs but that is a
different matter altogether

Alan
_______________________________________________
Bridge mailing list
Bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [AoE Tools]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]

  Powered by Linux