Re: kernel doesn't support bridge with a ppp interface ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



We use vtun which is a userland option, a little slow but offers rate-limiting and some other nice to have features.

When we require the lowest possible overhead option, we use the etherip kernel patches.


Dylan


On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 17:41 +0200, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
Malcolm Scott wrote:
> At 21:02 today, c.j wrote:
> 
>>> You can setup a tunnel with OpenVPN. You'd get a tap device on
>>> both sides which can be bridged with eth.
>> Thanks. But maybe we don't want OpenVPN for VPN. Now I can't get why kernel
>> do not support that. Have some disadvantages?
> 
> I'm not sure if this is even possible using standard protocols.  Bridging is 
> for Ethernet; PPP is not Ethernet.  So this would require some sort of 
> nonstandard Ethernet-over-PPP encapsulation protocol, and would only make 
see standard rfc3518, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3518.txt, I think there 
is a (old?) patch  flying around for this ...


_______________________________________________
Bridge mailing list
Bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge
_______________________________________________
Bridge mailing list
Bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [AoE Tools]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]

  Powered by Linux