On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:33:28 +0100 "Joakim Tjernlund" <joakim.tjernlund@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Currently one must unset the IP address on an i/f that is included in a > bridge and > move the IP address to the bridge i/f instead if one wants to maintain > connectivity with > the box. This is a problem for us as one loses all routes. The rename of the > i/f > is also a problem. > > Is there a fundamental reason one cannot keep the IP address on one i/f that > is a member in a bride? I only have two real interfaces in the bridge if > that > makes it any easier. > Any pointers where I need to adjust the bride code would be appreciated. > > Jocke When bridge is active on an interface all packets are processed by the bridge device not by the individual device. You can always setup a bridge with only one interface, or use a script that setups the bridge. _______________________________________________ Bridge mailing list Bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge
