Re: Re: Small packets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/29/07, Benny Amorsen <benny+usenet@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>> "LS" == Leigh Sharpe <lsharpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> LS> Standard e1000 hardware. The packets being bridged contain a VLAN
> LS> tag, which is included in the 60 bytes.
>
> The e1000 has VLAN acceleration. The VLAN tag is sent in a separate
> register. If you do packet capture on the sender, the packet will
> likely look 60 bytes long, even if it is 64 bytes on the wire.
>
> The same thing happens on receive. Packet dumping with VLAN's is a bit
> of a mess in Linux. If you're lucky you can find a card without VLAN
> acceleration to do the packet dump.
>
>
> /Benny
>

Are these the lengths on the wire or when captured on the host?   The
smallest VLAN tagged frame should be 68 bytes IIRC.  A tagged frame
that is 64 bytes seems too small.
_______________________________________________
Bridge mailing list
Bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [AoE Tools]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]

  Powered by Linux