>(I'm particularly referring to a 6.2.19-ish kernel, before the patches of the last few days)
Err, perhaps I actually mean 2.6.19-ish....
-----Original Message-----
From: Leigh Sharpe
Sent: Friday, 27 April 2007 2:53 PM
To: shemminger
Cc: bridge
Subject: RE: PVST
So, if I put a linux bridge in a network which has PVST packets flying around, will it pass them, or silently drop them?
Should I have STP disabled on my linux box?
(I'm particularly referring to a 6.2.19-ish kernel, before the patches of the last few days)
Regards,
Leigh
Leigh Sharpe
Network Systems Engineer
Pacific Wireless
Ph +61 3 9584 8966
Mob 0408 009 502
Helpdesk 1300 300 616
email lsharpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
web www.pacificwireless.com.au
-----Original Message-----
From: shemminger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:shemminger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 2:07 PM
To: Leigh Sharpe
Cc: bridge
Subject: Re: PVST
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:47:42 +1000
"Leigh Sharpe" <lsharpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi All,
> Does the current bridging code handle PVST properly, or just ordinary
> STP?
Ordinary, STP. The 2.6.22 kernel will have all the bits to run STP in
user mode, and there is a version of RSTP in userspace see:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/shemminger/git/rstp.git
The RSTP code uses the rstplib and it knows about VLAN's, but the hooks
aren't there yet. Eventually, full MSTP 802.Q seems like a good idea.
Someone had sent some patches to do PVST, but PVST seems to be Cisco
centric. and the patched version was too inflexible, so I didn't put
it in mainline.
_______________________________________________
Bridge mailing list
Bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge
_______________________________________________
Bridge mailing list
Bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge
