Re: [RFC 1/2] bridge: avoid ptype_all packet handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> I'm tempted to say I must be missing something here, since I can't see
> how this could possible work at all.  The string passed in should
> be interpreted as the ifindex value, and thus trigger a -ENODEV
> return from AF_PACKET's bind() implementation.

This is using packet_bind_spkt which uses a name instead of ifindex.

As you may recall, I've made a patch to convert it to use the new
(actually it's not-so-new anymore) AF_PACKET interface.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
_______________________________________________
Bridge mailing list
Bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [AoE Tools]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]

  Powered by Linux