On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 00:25:09 +0800 "d tbsky" <tbskyd at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi: > thanks for your reply. you say the bridge interface should take the ip > address, > not the nic. that's important. i think i go to the wrong direction. i want > nic > (eth0,dummy0) to have ip address, not br0. it seems not what linux bridge > designed to do... > by the way, i found if i set mac address manually :(eg: arp -s > 192.168.10.254 x:x:x:x:x:x), > then i can ping 192.168.10.254 via eth0. but i can never make dummy0 work in > any way. > You sound as if you are confused about bridging vs routing
