On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 02:55:47PM -0400, Andy Gospodarek wrote: > On 9/11/06, David Kimdon <david.kimdon at devicescape.com> wrote: > David, > > It looks like this code specifically ignores (which is OK for now) and > clears (which is not OK) the frame's 802.1p priority.i ah, yes, good point. > Have you tested > priority-tagged frames to see if they are passed correctly? well, they get mapped to the correct vlan (untagged), but, yes, we lose the priority. > Something like this would probably be fine: yes, thanks. -David
