On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 19:43:01 +0100 "Tim Keupen" <timbub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Have you looked at umlsim > no, problem has to be solved with vnuml > > >> Is this a bug or a feature? Why is it not allowed to bind an Interface > to two different bridges? > >> Is there a workaround for this issue? > > There was no good reason to allow it, I guess. Also, I would worry about > > races on deleting > > a bridge and the RCU issues. > But what should be a reasen not to allow it? Because it the input path hook how bridge's get data would cause increased stack depth (if it even worked). > What du you mean with races and RCU issues? Look at how interfaces are removed from bridges, and the code that notifies a bridge about interface changes. It would probably break as well. -- Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> OSDL http://developer.osdl.org/~shemminger
