[Bridge] slow network performance when using bridged interfaces in 2.6.13 compared to 2.6.12.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: [Bridge] slow network performance when using bridged interfaces in 2.6.13 compared to 2.6.12.
From: shemminger at osdl.org (Stephen Hemminger)
Date: Fri Oct 28 22:40:05 2005
In-reply-to: <20051028153617.7c039fbc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <W3514615840246961130535219@webmail4> <20051028153617.7c039fbc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Since you are using an e100, I would suspect the "CPU cycle saver"
patch that was added in 2.6.13, then removed in one of the stablilty
releases. A fixed version of the patch is in 2.6.14.  Read the
netdev archives for more detail.

References:
- [Bridge] slow network performance when using bridged interfaces in 2.6.13 compared to 2.6.12.
  - From: Josh Burke
- [Bridge] slow network performance when using bridged interfaces in 2.6.13 compared to 2.6.12.
  - From: Stephen Hemminger

Prev by Date: [Bridge] slow network performance when using bridged interfaces in 2.6.13 compared to 2.6.12.
Next by Date: [Bridge] device eth0 is already a member of a bridge; can't enslave it to bridge Net6
Previous by thread: [Bridge] slow network performance when using bridged interfaces in 2.6.13 compared to 2.6.12.
Next by thread: [Bridge] slow network performance when using bridged interfaces in 2.6.13 compared to 2.6.12.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Netdev] [AoE Tools] [Linux Wireless] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Linux for Hams] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Admin] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux]

Powered by Linux