On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 00:04:58 +0100 Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 03:36:40PM -0500, chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote: > > In message <20050316181532.GA3251@xxxxxxxxx>,Adrian Bunk writes: > > >Letting CONFIG_BRIDGE depend on CONFIG_ATM doesn't sound like a good > > >idea, since I doubt all people using the Bridge code require ATM > > >support. > > > > how about the following? > >... > > Looks good Ditto
