Rusty Russell wrote: >On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 17:10 -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > >>In tree, yes. But leaving the NF_HOOK()/NF_HOOK_THRESH() compat >>macros in there for out-of-tree modules I feel is mandatory, it's >>a major API change. >> > >I'm not so sure. The hook functions which are registered, sure (ie. >keep the calling convention the same). But do any external modules use >NF_HOOK()? That implies they're writing their own network stack for >some protocol, which I would expect to be uncommon. > Freeswan comes to mind. But I guess one more #ifdef can't hurt :) Regards Patrick
