[Bridge] Benchmarking bridging vs. routing on same hardware/network

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I have been running benchmarks to compare the performance of bridging to
routing on the same hardware.  

The bridge/router system is a dual Opteron 246 (2.0Ghz); Tyan 2882
motherboard; 2 GB PC3200 memory (1 GB in each CPU's bank; 128bit
configuration); dual e1000 based NIC; PCI-X 133Mhz; 2.6.9 Kernel; NAPI
enabled in the kernel and the NIC drivers; CPU affinity ties each eth to a
specific CPU; system otherwise idle.  

My test configuration is:

Packet Generator System <--> Bridge/Router <--> Packet Recipient

The network and hosts are otherwise idle.

Using pktgen (the Linux packet generator) I can send 459,000pps through this
hardware when it is configured as a router.  I only get 252,000pps through
the hardware when configured as a bridge.  

Needless to say, I use two IP subnets when routing, and a single subnet
while bridging.  Also, when routing I set the mac addr destination for
pktgen to the router interface (otherwise it won't pick up the packets),
whereas when bridging I set it to the recipient's mac address.

Any ideas why the performance of the bridge is so bad?  



[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [AoE Tools]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]

  Powered by Linux