On Thu, 2004-09-30 at 09:23 -0400, Dan Eble wrote: > Is this an acceptable way to notify a daemon when a bridge address > changes? Probably, but you need to do it against the 2.6 code (which is different). I consider the 2.4 pretty firmly frozen.
On Thu, 2004-09-30 at 09:23 -0400, Dan Eble wrote: > Is this an acceptable way to notify a daemon when a bridge address > changes? Probably, but you need to do it against the 2.6 code (which is different). I consider the 2.4 pretty firmly frozen.
|