On Sat, Sep 11, 2004 at 08:09:56AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 10:30:11PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: > > Hello, > Here so more information, > > > On a Sun Sparc Ultra5, where `uname -m` reports "sparc64", > > and the bridge kernel modules is loaded (`insmod bridge`), > the kernel is version 2.4.26 And the brctl I use is 1.0.4 > > reports on `brctl addbr br0` with > > add bridge failed: Operation not supported > > > > That failure writes in /var/log/kern.log > > sys32_ioctl(brctl:572): Unknown cmd fd(3) cmd(000089a0) arg(effffcbd) > the 572 is the process id 89a0 is SIOCBRADDBR, but SIOCBRADDBR is a 2.6 kernel item ( not in 2.4) > > My questions are: > > > > * Are there succesfull reported sparc64 systems doing bridging? > > * What should I do to get that sparc64 acting as a bridge? > A recompile with gcc-2.95 did not show improvement. AFAICT it is brctl 1.0.4 that needs a 2.6 kernel. > > Cheers > > Geert Stappers -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.osdl.org/pipermail/bridge/attachments/20040911/a7e8770b/attachment.bin
