On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:37:40 -0700 Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > This is the 2.4 version which incorporates the observations from Kishore > about 2.6. The existing 2.4 code set the age properly, but did not increment > correctly for HZ=1000 and could send a stale (expired) configuration. Both 2.4.x and 2.6.x variants applied, thanks Stephen.