[Bridge] Bridge and PACKET-socket

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bart De Schuymer <bdschuym@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Well, if you're sending all IP packets to userspace I doubt that's faster than 
> an ebtables kernel module...

Right, I forgot to mention that in this case it's only 802.3 frames
that I'm interested in. I expect to get very few packets, and don't
want to impact the performance of the other IP-based traffic.

Also, I've already implemented the protocol in userspace and don't
wanna move it into the kernel ;-)

> I don't know the details, but can't you hook some kernel function onto 
> ETH_P_ALL that only sends IP packets to userspace?

This still sounds like packet-socket territory to me. Wouldn't it be
better to clarify/extend the packet-socket interface to cover bridged
ports?

-Luke



[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [AoE Tools]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]

  Powered by Linux