On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 15:17 +0200, david.wagner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Questions: > ========== > I wasn't sure what magic ioctl number to use, so I settled to use the same one > as a part of UBI: 'O', which was so far only used by UBI but on a higher range > and leaving some room for UBI to add ioctls (for nw, it uses 'O'/0x00-0x06 and > ubiblk uses 'O'/0x10-0x11). Is it ok or should ubiblk use a different > number/range ? I think this is OK to share them between UBI and ubiblk, as long as this is documented. But I always CC Arnd when it comes to ioctl-related questions. P.S. Arnd, you can always find the initial post in lkml, if needed. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-embedded" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
