Re: [PWM v5 1/3] PWM: Implement a generic PWM framework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mike:


Thanks for the great feedback and detailed going-over.  Will fix all
your points, but have a question:

On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> +#ifdef MODULE
>> +module_init(pwm_init);
>> +module_exit(pwm_exit);
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>> +#else
>> +postcore_initcall(pwm_init);
>> +#endif
>
> i dont think you need this MODULE trickery.  common code already takes
> care of this for you, and it'd let you avoid a warning about pwm_exit
> being unused.

So the postcore_initcall() becomes equivalent to module_init() when I
build as a module?  That would make sense, but I had never thought
about it before now...


b.g.
-- 
Bill Gatliff
bgat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-embedded" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Linux MMC Devel]     [U-Boot V2]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux