On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 07:24:44PM +0200, Samo Pogacnik wrote: > On 25.08.2010 (sre) at 11:16 -0700 Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 07:14:37PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > > > > > That's one extra process, not that much, right? > > > > > > > > > > About 150K or so way too much and its not robust. > > > > > > > > Fair enough. So, with this driver, would it make sense for the distros > > > > to switch over to using it instead of the above line in their initrd? > > > > > > Distros no - I doubt any normal PC distro would turn the facility on. > > > Embedded - yes especially deeply embedded. > > > > So should this be dependent on CONFIG_EMBEDDED then? > > > > Should i resend the patch with CONFIG_EMBEDDED dependency enabled? I do > not have any real objections to that, except that the driver operates > the same way regardless of the (non-)embedded configuration. No, I can change it when I apply the patch next week (sorry, swamped at the moment.) thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-embedded" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
