Re: A better way to sequence driver initialization?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Grant Likely wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>   
>> In cases where you can specifically note that dependencies, doing so will
>> save you a world of pain. Despite that, it's simply not possible to do
>> this as a free-for-all. Devices or busses that can tolerate multi-threaded
>> probing need to be converted over one at a time, but even then you still
>> need the dependency tracking for those that depend on link order today.
>>     

Who's to say a function like gpio_request_wait_for_it(GPIO_NUMBER,
"dependent-driver") isn't the way to do the dependency tracking?  I
can't even implement that without a context that can sleep...

b.g.

-- 
Bill Gatliff
bgat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-embedded" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Linux MMC Devel]     [U-Boot V2]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux