Re: [PATCH] devtmpfs: support !CONFIG_TMPFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:38, Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Tokarev <mjt@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>  >> +#ifdef CONFIG_TMPFS
>  >> return get_sb_single(fs_type, flags, data, shmem_fill_super, mnt);
>  >> +#else
>  >> +   return get_sb_single(fs_type, flags, data, ramfs_fill_super, mnt);
>  >> +#endif
>  >> }
>
>  Michael> May be completely not to the point or even wrong, but I were
>  Michael> starring at this change for quite some time trying to understand
>  Michael> what's the difference.  Can we do it like this:
>
>  Michael> #ifdef CONFIG_TMPFS
>  Michael> # define devtmpfs_fill_super shmem_fill_super
>  Michael> #else
>  Michael> # define devtmpfs_fill_super ramfs_fill_super
>  Michael> #endif
>  Michael>       return get_sb_single(fs_type, flags, data, devtmpfs_fill_super, mnt);

> Sure, if people find that cleaner - Kay?

For the style:
  I would prefer your original version.

For the patch:
  Acked-by: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-embedded" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Linux MMC Devel]     [U-Boot V2]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux