On 12/28/09 19:57, Somebody in the thread at some point said: Hi Peter -
Thanks for an interesting discussion and all your free buildroot advertising ;) (buildroot maintainer)
Hey you are welcome... in the situations where you can't play the distro game then buildroot is the lifesaver. Same as U-Boot I have experienced in detail the amount of work involved in what buildroot delivers and it has to be respected for what it does.
I'm really saying there's a region where buildroot is the right answer and a threshold beyond which a "real distro" is the right answer, we should not just keep on doing what we have being doing.
(But you want to be careful you don't grow into OpenEmbedded's build system. For me it failed partway through a 1000+ package build on trying to build *host* dbus libs for me (yes, host dbus).
I just wanted to package "hello world" on Openmoko. They did fix it in the end so it would build host dbus OK to be fair. But I felt that was a very long way from the point.)
Andy> This thread was meant to be about merits of Qi, it's kinda gone Andy> off into embedded with distro rootfs because the philosophy is Andy> related. In both cases burden on the developer is intended to be Andy> removed and effort simplified to get the job done more reliably Andy> and quicker. Sure, if your embedded device is very PC like (size/functionality) that makes sense.
Thanks. As written the threshold seems to be at ARM11+ and SD particularly making it into enough of a "PC" you don't have to worry about bash vs ash or where a few 100MB of storage is going to come from.
-Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-embedded" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
