On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Bill Gatliff <bgat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Grant Likely wrote: >> >> But that *isn't* the primary purpose of the GPIO subsystem. All that >> stuff is layered on top of the GPIO pin management code and doesn't >> really play into this debate. >> > > I don't understand you. You are saying that the majority of gpiochip > implementations also deal with pin multiplexing? They must be terribly > broken on the platforms I'm working on, then, because they don't seem to > work at all! :) Nope. pin mux is a different problem. I'm talking about the code to register pin controller drivers and for users to obtain a reference to a pin. g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-embedded" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
