Sam Ravnborg wrote: > It is not that we are talking big and complex stuff here. I agree completely. > pramfs is likely to be used for small things and then having to > fix endian on a few headers in the on-dsk format does not matter. I agree with this, but mostly out of exhaustion. > Not compared to the potential disadvantages. I can see no potential disadvantages. > It should be possible to read a file-system on your x86 64bit > box that you wrote with your small powerpc target. For a (NV)RAM-based filesystem?? WTH??? This is not my file system, so I don't have a dog in this fight. I just wanted to clarify what I thought were some misconceptions about the use cases and priorities for the FS. My "advocacy" may be interfering with understanding this system and its purpose. I'll be quiet now. -- Tim ============================= Tim Bird Architecture Group Chair, CE Linux Forum Senior Staff Engineer, Sony Corporation of America ============================= -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-embedded" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
