On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 11:09 +0530, Suresh Jayaraman wrote:
> Hi Trond,
>
> Do you think this patch is OK? Can this be considered for merging?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Masahiro Tamori wrote:
> > Hello Suresh and Mathieu,
> >
> > 2009/4/2 Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@xxxxxxx>:
> >> Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> >>> * Suresh Jayaraman (sjayaraman@xxxxxxx) wrote:
> >>>> This patch attempts to add splice writes support. In essence, it just
> >>>> calls generic_file_splice_write() after doing a little sanity check.
> >>>> This would allow LTTng users that are using NFS to store trace data.
> >>>> There could be more applications that could be benefitted too.
> >>>>
> >>>> I have tested this using the Jens' test program and have found no
> >>>> real issues. The test program is inlined below:
> >>>>
> >>> There is just a small checkpatch nit that I'll fix directly in place in
> >>> the LTTng tree.
> >>>
> >>> WARNING: %Ld/%Lu are not-standard C, use %lld/%llu
> >>> #93: FILE: fs/nfs/file.c:564:
> >>> + dprintk("NFS splice_write(%s/%s, %lu@%Lu)\n",
> >>>
> >>> total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 42 lines checked
> >>>
> >> Yes, I noticed it. There are quite a few places in nfs code where we
> >> happened to use that (that doesn't imply that it shouldn't be fixed), so
> >> I thought it's OK.
> >>
> >>> That's great ! I'll pull it in the LTTng tree so my users can try it.
> >>> They currently cannot write LTTng traces to NFS mounts anyway.
> >> Yes, please report the test results. Would appreciate it very much.
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >
> > Thank you for creating a patch !!
> >
> > I tested it, and it works fine.
> >
> > My environment is following,
> > LTTV 0.12.10
> > LTTng 0.100
> > LTT Control 0.65
> > Kernles 2.6.29
> >
> > LTTng version is old now, but the test is passed on ARM11 target.
> >
> > Furthermore, I run the splice test and the test is passed too.
> > The test code is copied from
> > http://kzk9.net/blog/2007/05/splice2.html
> > (Japanese page)
> >
> > Thanks all people who commented this issue.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Masahiro Tamori
> >
> >>>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/file.c b/fs/nfs/file.c
> >>>> index 90f292b..13d6a00 100644
> >>>> --- a/fs/nfs/file.c
> >>>> +++ b/fs/nfs/file.c
> >>>> @@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ static ssize_t nfs_file_splice_read(struct file *filp, loff_t *ppos,
> >>>> size_t count, unsigned int flags);
> >>>> static ssize_t nfs_file_read(struct kiocb *, const struct iovec *iov,
> >>>> unsigned long nr_segs, loff_t pos);
> >>>> +static ssize_t nfs_file_splice_write(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
> >>>> + struct file *filp, loff_t *ppos,
> >>>> + size_t count, unsigned int flags);
> >>>> static ssize_t nfs_file_write(struct kiocb *, const struct iovec *iov,
> >>>> unsigned long nr_segs, loff_t pos);
> >>>> static int nfs_file_flush(struct file *, fl_owner_t id);
> >>>> @@ -76,6 +79,7 @@ const struct file_operations nfs_file_operations = {
> >>>> .lock = nfs_lock,
> >>>> .flock = nfs_flock,
> >>>> .splice_read = nfs_file_splice_read,
> >>>> + .splice_write = nfs_file_splice_write,
> >>>> .check_flags = nfs_check_flags,
> >>>> .setlease = nfs_setlease,
> >>>> };
> >>>> @@ -550,6 +554,26 @@ out_swapfile:
> >>>> goto out;
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> +static ssize_t nfs_file_splice_write(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
> >>>> + struct file *filp, loff_t *ppos,
> >>>> + size_t count, unsigned int flags)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> + struct dentry *dentry = filp->f_path.dentry;
> >>>> + struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + dprintk("NFS splice_write(%s/%s, %lu@%Lu)\n",
> >>>> + dentry->d_parent->d_name.name, dentry->d_name.name,
> >>>> + (unsigned long) count, (unsigned long long) *ppos);
> >>>> +
> >>>> + if (IS_SWAPFILE(inode)) {
> >>>> + printk(KERN_INFO "NFS: attempt to write to active swap"
> >>>> + "file!\n");
> >>>> + return -EBUSY;
> >>>> + }
I don't know that we really need this. We should sweep through the NFS
code and kill all those IS_SWAPFILE() thingys. Or at least #define
IS_SWAPFILE(a) (0)
...
> >>>> +
> >>>> + return generic_file_splice_write(pipe, filp, ppos, count, flags);
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +
> >>>> static int do_getlk(struct file *filp, int cmd, struct file_lock *fl)
> >>>> {
> >>>> struct inode *inode = filp->f_mapping->host;
> >>>>
Otherwise it looks fine...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-embedded" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
