On Son, 2009-01-04 at 22:13 +0000, Jamie Lokier wrote: > Rob Landley wrote: > > In a private email, Bernd Petrovitsch suggested "set -- $i" and then > > using NAME=$1; PERIOD=$2. (I keep getting private email responses > > to these sort of threads, and then getting dismissed as the only one > > who cares about the issue. Less so this time around, but still...) > > This apparently works all the way back to the bourne shell. > > If you're going "all the way back to the bourne shell", don't use "set "Going back to a Bourne shell" was neither the intention nor makes it sense IMHO. I mentioned it to point out that the `set -- ' (or `set x `) is nothing new or even a bash-ism. > -- $i"; use "set x $i" instead, and don't expect to do any arithmetic > in the shell; use "expr" or "awk" for arithmetic. > > (Not relevant to kernel scripts, imho, since you can always assume > something a bit more modern and not too stripped down). ACK. A bash can IMHO be expected. Even going for `dash` is IMHO somewhat too extreme. > (I have 850 Linux boxes on my network with a bourne shell which > doesn't do $((...)). I won't be building kernels on them though :-) Believe it or not, but there are folks out there who build the firmware on ARM 200 MHz NFS-mounted systems natively (and not simply cross-compile it on a 2GHz PC .....). Bernd -- Firmix Software GmbH http://www.firmix.at/ mobil: +43 664 4416156 fax: +43 1 7890849-55 Embedded Linux Development and Services -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-embedded" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
