On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 15:16, Bill Gatliff wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 14:14, Bill Gatliff wrote:
>>> +int pwm_register(struct pwm_device *pwm)
>>> +{
>>> + struct pwm_channel *p;
>>> + int wchan;
>>> + int ret = 0;
>>
>> the initialization to 0 here isnt needed
>
> This is literally the only feedback I have received. I take that to mean that
> the code basically works as advertised, and nobody else has any problems with it
> (it continues to work fine for me here).
>
> So, what's the next step? How do I advocate for getting this API into mainline?
you looking to be maintainer ? if so, i imagine you start a git tree
(on kernel.org?) for people to pull from, post patches to mainline now
and indicate you'd ask for a 2.6.29 merge ...
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-embedded" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
