> > 2) so is disable interrupts twice is a problem, or just
> enabling them after they are disabled (which sounds like
> how it should be) a problem.
>
> both are a problem. the non-state saving version cannot be
> used
> recursively nor in parallel to the state-saving version.
Much clear now, Thanks Mike!
here's a follow up question.
what about Non maskable interrupts ? disabling interrupt won't have any effect on that right ?
thanks
Fundu.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-embedded" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
