Hello Jared, On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Jared Hulbert <jaredeh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> FWIW, I'm not sure it's a good idea to name this new filesystem AXFS. >> People are almost certainly going to confuse it with XFS despite > People that care about their filesystem choice know their choices. People that don't care, well they don't care. Maybe AXIPFS would be the close alternative. One question on the use-case profiling and subsequent image rebuild: What if the use-case did not cover all cases of XIP use? If a compressed page is attempted to be executed, will the filesystem fall back to decompression to RAM and execution from RAM, or will this result in a faulty system? The design choices look real good. Congrats on the achievement. Regards, -- Leon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-embedded" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
