On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 06:30:54PM -0700, David VomLehn wrote: > Grant Likely wrote: > >> I'm not thrilled with this patch. It seems so much more straight >> forward in your special case, but it comes at the expense of making >> the code path more complex in every other case. >> >> I would much rather see this be done using the existing console driver >> interface. The only possible reason I could see wanting to do things >> this way is if you don't trust the console code to call your console >> driver, which I think is a pretty unlikely case. > > I'll buy that reasoning. > > Regardless of implementation, it seems to me that it could be of use for > some other embedded platforms. Any suggestions as to where it should go > in the tree? drivers/char? drivers/misc? Depends on what you're storing to. Can you send more details about the specific use case that you will use this interface for? g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-embedded" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
