Re: cross-compiling alternatives (was Re: [PATCH 0/1] Embedded Maintainer(s)...)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:50 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:

> > If we just made people write portable code and proper Makefiles,
> > it would be less of an issue :)
>
> people cant even write proper *native* makefiles.  mtd-utils for
> example ;).

meooowww!  :-)  but at the risk of dragging this even further
off-topic, i am *constantly* asked by people how to set up makefiles
for their software project, and what would be nice is a small
collection of examples of a makefile (or makefiles) done *right*.  as
in, properly recursive, supports cross-compiling without having to
remove your left nad, etc, etc.

so ... would anyone like to recommend a software package or two
somewhere whose makefile(s) is/are, ITHO, done well?  that i/we could
just point at and say, "do it like that!"  anyone?  anyone?  bueller?

rday
--

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
    Have classroom, will lecture.

http://crashcourse.ca                          Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
========================================================================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-embedded" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Linux MMC Devel]     [U-Boot V2]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux