Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] acpi/ghes, cper: Recognize and cache CXL Protocol errors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 10:59:14AM -0800, Luck, Tony wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 08:44:19AM +0000, Smita Koralahalli wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> > index b72772494655..4d725d988c43 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> > @@ -674,6 +674,56 @@ static void ghes_defer_non_standard_event(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata,
> >  	schedule_work(&entry->work);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static void cxl_cper_post_prot_err(struct cxl_cper_sec_prot_err *prot_err,
> > +				   int severity)
> > +{
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_PCIEAER
> 
> #ifdef in ".c" code is ugly. But I don't see a less ugly way to deal
> with this. Moving this elsewhere and adding an empty stub function
> for when CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_PCIEAER isn't configured doesn't make things
> any better.
>

The generally accepted ways I've seen for static funcs in .c is:

#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_PCIEAER
static void ghes_handle_aer(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata)
{
	...
}
#else
static void ghes_handle_aer(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata) { }
#endif

This at least makes the function that does stuff easier to read and
gives you a spot to throw out a "Config not enabled" error if its
beneficial.

More of a style nit than anything else.


But either way,

Reviewed-by: Gregory Price <gourry@xxxxxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux