On 20/01/2025 10:32, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 at 11:27, Usama Arif <usamaarif642@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > ... >> Hi Ard, >> >> Just wanted to check how should we proceed forward? Should we try and fix the warning >> and corruption during kexec as done in this series or not initialize memory attributes >> table at all in kexec boot? I would prefer fixing the issues as in this series. >> > > I would prefer kexec boot on x86 to disregard the memory attributes > table entirely. Would you like Dave to send something like https://lore.kernel.org/all/CALu+AoS8tb=HgaybDw5OG4A1QbOXHvuidpu0ynmz-nE1nBqzTA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ on the mailing list (wrapped in ifdef CONFIG_X86_64) or we could do https://lore.kernel.org/all/fd63613c-fd26-42de-b5ed-cc734f72eb36@xxxxxxxxx/ as well. Or if there is any other way you prefer, I am happy to implement and test. Thanks, Usama
