Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] acpi/ghes, cxl/pci: Trace FW-First CXL Protocol Errors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/1/2024 8:52 AM, Ira Weiny wrote:
Smita Koralahalli wrote:
When PCIe AER is in FW-First, OS should process CXL Protocol errors from
CPER records.

Reuse the existing work queue cxl_cper_work registered with GHES to notify
the CXL subsystem on a Protocol error.

The defined trace events cxl_aer_uncorrectable_error and
cxl_aer_correctable_error currently trace native CXL AER errors. Reuse
them to trace FW-First Protocol Errors.

Signed-off-by: Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@xxxxxxx>
---
v2:
	Removed pr_warn for serial number.
	p_err -> rec/p_rec.
---
  drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
  drivers/cxl/core/pci.c   | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
  drivers/cxl/cxlpci.h     |  3 +++
  drivers/cxl/pci.c        | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
  include/cxl/event.h      |  1 +
  5 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
index 9dcf0f78458f..5082885e1f2c 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
@@ -723,6 +723,20 @@ static void cxl_cper_handle_prot_err(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata)
if (cxl_cper_handle_prot_err_info(gdata, &wd.p_rec))
  		return;
+
+	guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&cxl_cper_work_lock);
+
+	if (!cxl_cper_work)
+		return;
+
+	wd.event_type = CXL_CPER_EVENT_PROT_ERR;
+
+	if (!kfifo_put(&cxl_cper_fifo, wd)) {
+		pr_err_ratelimited("CXL CPER kfifo overflow\n");
+		return;
+	}
+
+	schedule_work(cxl_cper_work);
  }
int cxl_cper_register_work(struct work_struct *work)
diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
index 5b46bc46aaa9..39ef24c8991f 100644
--- a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
@@ -650,6 +650,30 @@ void read_cdat_data(struct cxl_port *port)
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(read_cdat_data, CXL);
+void cxl_trace_prot_err(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds,
+			struct cxl_cper_prot_err *rec)
+{
+	u32 status, fe;
+
+	if (rec->severity == CXL_AER_CORRECTABLE) {
+		status = rec->cxl_ras.cor_status & ~rec->cxl_ras.cor_mask;
+
+		trace_cxl_aer_correctable_error(cxlds->cxlmd, status);
+	} else {
+		status = rec->cxl_ras.uncor_status & ~rec->cxl_ras.uncor_mask;
+
+		if (hweight32(status) > 1)
+			fe = BIT(FIELD_GET(CXL_RAS_CAP_CONTROL_FE_MASK,
+					   rec->cxl_ras.cap_control));
+		else
+			fe = status;
+
+		trace_cxl_aer_uncorrectable_error(cxlds->cxlmd, status, fe,
+						  rec->cxl_ras.header_log);
+	}
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(cxl_trace_prot_err, CXL);
+
  static void __cxl_handle_cor_ras(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds,
  				 void __iomem *ras_base)
  {
diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxlpci.h b/drivers/cxl/cxlpci.h
index 4da07727ab9c..8acd8f2c39c9 100644
--- a/drivers/cxl/cxlpci.h
+++ b/drivers/cxl/cxlpci.h
@@ -129,4 +129,7 @@ void read_cdat_data(struct cxl_port *port);
  void cxl_cor_error_detected(struct pci_dev *pdev);
  pci_ers_result_t cxl_error_detected(struct pci_dev *pdev,
  				    pci_channel_state_t state);
+struct cxl_cper_prot_err;
+void cxl_trace_prot_err(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds,
+			struct cxl_cper_prot_err *rec);
  #endif /* __CXL_PCI_H__ */
diff --git a/drivers/cxl/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
index 915102f5113f..0a29321921a0 100644
--- a/drivers/cxl/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
@@ -1064,12 +1064,28 @@ static void cxl_handle_cper_event(enum cxl_event_type ev_type,
  			       &uuid_null, &rec->event);
  }
+static void cxl_handle_prot_err(struct cxl_cper_prot_err *rec)
+{
+	struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds;
+
+	cxlds = get_cxl_devstate(rec->segment, rec->bus,
+				 rec->device, rec->function);

As mentioned in 2/4 I don't think this is going to work correctly.

+	if (!cxlds)
+		return;
+
+	cxl_trace_prot_err(cxlds, rec);
+}
+
  static void cxl_cper_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
  {
  	struct cxl_cper_work_data wd;
- while (cxl_cper_kfifo_get(&wd))
-		cxl_handle_cper_event(wd.event_type, &wd.rec);
+	while (cxl_cper_kfifo_get(&wd)) {
+		if (wd.event_type == CXL_CPER_EVENT_PROT_ERR)
+			cxl_handle_prot_err(&wd.p_rec);
+		else
+			cxl_handle_cper_event(wd.event_type, &wd.rec);

Why does this need to change?

Have cxl_handle_cper_event() decode the BDF as it does now and call
cxl_handle_prot_err() there?  I think you could drop patch 2/4 entirely
and not have to duplicate the logic.

Ira

Yeah works for me. My intention was to not disturb the cxl_handle_cper_event() as that was focussed on handling device errors.

Thanks
Smita

+	}
  }
  static DECLARE_WORK(cxl_cper_work, cxl_cper_work_fn);
diff --git a/include/cxl/event.h b/include/cxl/event.h
index 5b316150556a..d854d8c435db 100644
--- a/include/cxl/event.h
+++ b/include/cxl/event.h
@@ -115,6 +115,7 @@ struct cxl_event_record_raw {
  } __packed;
enum cxl_event_type {
+	CXL_CPER_EVENT_PROT_ERR,
  	CXL_CPER_EVENT_GENERIC,
  	CXL_CPER_EVENT_GEN_MEDIA,
  	CXL_CPER_EVENT_DRAM,
--
2.17.1







[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux