[PATCH 2/2] tpm: do not ignore memblock_reserve return value

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



tpm code currently ignores a relevant failure case silently.
Add an error to make this failure non-silent.

Signed-off-by: Gregory Price <gourry@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/firmware/efi/tpm.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/tpm.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/tpm.c
index 9c3613e6af15..b6939a6d44d9 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/tpm.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/tpm.c
@@ -61,7 +61,11 @@ int __init efi_tpm_eventlog_init(void)
 	}
 
 	tbl_size = sizeof(*log_tbl) + log_tbl->size;
-	memblock_reserve(efi.tpm_log, tbl_size);
+	if (memblock_reserve(efi.tpm_log, tbl_size)) {
+		pr_err("TPM Event Log memblock reserve fails 0x%lx - %x\n",
+		       efi.tpm_log, tbl_size);
+		goto out;
+	}
 
 	if (efi.tpm_final_log == EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR) {
 		pr_info("TPM Final Events table not present\n");
-- 
2.43.0





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux