On Thu, 22 Aug 2024 at 13:42, Pingfan Liu <piliu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 10:27 PM Lennart Poettering > <mzxreary@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Mo, 19.08.24 22:53, Pingfan Liu (piliu@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > > > *** Background *** > > > > > > As more PE format kernel images are introduced, it post challenge to kexec to > > > cope with the new format. > > > > > > In my attempt to add support for arm64 zboot image in the kernel [1], > > > Ard suggested using an emulator to tackle this issue. Last year, when > > > Jan tried to introduce UKI support in the kernel [2], Ard mentioned the > > > emulator approach again [3] > > > > Hmm, systemd's systemd-stub code tries to load certain "side-car" > > files placed next to the UKI, via the UEFI file system APIs. What's > > your intention with the UEFI emulator regarding that? The sidecars are > > somewhat important, because that's how we parameterize otherwise > > strictly sealed, immutable UKIs. > > > IIUC, you are referring to UKI addons. > > > Hence, what's the story there? implement some form of fs driver (for > > what fs precisely?) in the emulator too? > > > As for addon, that is a missing part in this series. I have overlooked > this issue. Originally, I thought that there was no need to implement > a disk driver and vfat file system, just preload them into memory, and > finally present them through the uefi API. I will take a closer look > at it and chew on it. > Hi Pingfan, If more and more stuff needs coming in, not only the limited boot services then it will be way too complicated and hard to maintain and debug, also the two kexec code paths are duplicated somehow. It is really bad.. I forgot why we can not just extract the kernel from UKI and then load it directly, if the embedded kernel is also signed it should be good? Thanks Dave
