Tony Luck wrote: > On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 01:17:01PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > > [ add Tony who may care about the more-reliable removal ] > > I don't think I care about removal the fake options. I have had > systems that support real "more-reliable" memory for many years. Ok, lets remove it and see what happens. I recall now that the major policy knob that users may care about is efi=nosoftreserve, and the ability to specify efi_fake_mem for testing purposes can move to memmap= on the assumption that kernel-devs are much less likely to specify broken settings, or at least can pick up the pieces. Ard, you can add: Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
