Hi Mauro, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on efi/next] [also build test ERROR on rafael-pm/linux-next rafael-pm/bleeding-edge linus/master v6.10-rc5 next-20240626] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Mauro-Carvalho-Chehab/efi-cper-Adjust-infopfx-size-to-accept-an-extra-space/20240625-203952 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/efi/efi.git next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b9354882f45a0c600e65df4bacee2f1080c4ba89.1719219886.git.mchehab%2Bhuawei%40kernel.org patch subject: [PATCH v5 3/4] efi/cper: align ARM CPER type with UEFI 2.9A/2.10 specs config: i386-randconfig-004-20240627 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240627/202406271626.72sHSPJJ-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config) compiler: clang version 18.1.5 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 617a15a9eac96088ae5e9134248d8236e34b91b1) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240627/202406271626.72sHSPJJ-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202406271626.72sHSPJJ-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c:566:6: error: call to undeclared function 'FIELD_GET'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 566 | FIELD_GET(CPER_ARM_ERR_TYPE_MASK, err_info->type), | ^ 1 error generated. vim +/FIELD_GET +566 drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c 530 531 static bool ghes_handle_arm_hw_error(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata, 532 int sev, bool sync) 533 { 534 struct cper_sec_proc_arm *err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata); 535 int flags = sync ? MF_ACTION_REQUIRED : 0; 536 char error_type[120]; 537 bool queued = false; 538 int sec_sev, i; 539 char *p; 540 541 log_arm_hw_error(err); 542 543 sec_sev = ghes_severity(gdata->error_severity); 544 if (sev != GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE || sec_sev != GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE) 545 return false; 546 547 p = (char *)(err + 1); 548 for (i = 0; i < err->err_info_num; i++) { 549 struct cper_arm_err_info *err_info = (struct cper_arm_err_info *)p; 550 bool is_cache = err_info->type & CPER_ARM_CACHE_ERROR; 551 bool has_pa = (err_info->validation_bits & CPER_ARM_INFO_VALID_PHYSICAL_ADDR); 552 553 /* 554 * The field (err_info->error_info & BIT(26)) is fixed to set to 555 * 1 in some old firmware of HiSilicon Kunpeng920. We assume that 556 * firmware won't mix corrected errors in an uncorrected section, 557 * and don't filter out 'corrected' error here. 558 */ 559 if (is_cache && has_pa) { 560 queued = ghes_do_memory_failure(err_info->physical_fault_addr, flags); 561 p += err_info->length; 562 continue; 563 } 564 565 cper_bits_to_str(error_type, sizeof(error_type), > 566 FIELD_GET(CPER_ARM_ERR_TYPE_MASK, err_info->type), 567 cper_proc_error_type_strs, 568 ARRAY_SIZE(cper_proc_error_type_strs)); 569 570 pr_warn_ratelimited(FW_WARN GHES_PFX 571 "Unhandled processor error type 0x%02x: %s%s\n", 572 err_info->type, error_type, 573 (err_info->type & ~CPER_ARM_ERR_TYPE_MASK) ? " with reserved bit(s)" : ""); 574 p += err_info->length; 575 } 576 577 return queued; 578 } 579 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
