Ira Weiny wrote: > If CXL is solely managed by firmware (including HDM configuration and > event processing via firmware first) it is possible to run the system > without the CXL software loaded. In this case no CXL callback will be > loaded and CXL CPER errors will not be processed at all. > > In this case memory device and region (HPA) information is missing but > omitting the error completely is not friendly. Some device information > is available the event. > > Trace CXL CPER events if the CXL stack is not loaded. A balance was > chosen to decode only the CPER header as this configuration is likely > rare. I think the justification for this is weak and it pollutes the user ABI. What environment cares about CXL RAS without the CXL driver? If such a use case ever pops up it is trivial to revive this otherwise saves carrying this and all the minor maintenance overhead it causes.
