Dan Williams wrote: > Ira Weiny wrote: > > BIOS can configure memory devices as firmware first. This will send CXL > > events to the firmware instead of the OS. The firmware can then send > > these events to the OS via UEFI. > > > > UEFI v2.10 section N.2.14 defines a Common Platform Error Record (CPER) > > format for CXL Component Events. The format is mostly the same as the > > CXL Common Event Record Format. The difference is a GUID is used in > > the Section Type to identify the event type. > > > > Add EFI support to detect CXL CPER records and call a notifier chain > > with the record data blobs to be processed by the CXL code. > > It is no longer a notifier chain in this version. I wouldn't even call > it a notifier, it's just a registered callback. Ah yea I missed that in my rework sorry. [snip] > > +DECLARE_RWSEM(cxl_cper_rw_sem); > > +static cxl_cper_notifier cper_notifier; > > + > > +void cxl_cper_post_event(const char *pfx, guid_t *sec_type, > > + struct cper_cxl_event_rec *rec) > > +{ > > + struct cxl_cper_event_data data = { > > + .rec = rec, > > + }; > > + > > + if (!(rec->hdr.validation_bits & CPER_CXL_COMP_EVENT_LOG_VALID)) { > > + pr_err(FW_WARN "cxl event no Component Event Log present\n"); > > + return; > > + } > > + > > + if (guid_equal(sec_type, &CPER_SEC_CXL_GEN_MEDIA_GUID)) > > + data.event_type = CXL_CPER_EVENT_GEN_MEDIA; > > + else if (guid_equal(sec_type, &CPER_SEC_CXL_DRAM_GUID)) > > + data.event_type = CXL_CPER_EVENT_DRAM; > > + else if (guid_equal(sec_type, &CPER_SEC_CXL_MEM_MODULE_GUID)) > > + data.event_type = CXL_CPER_EVENT_MEM_MODULE; > > + > > + down_read(&cxl_cper_rw_sem); > > guard(rwsem_read)(&cxl_cper_rw_sem); Much better. Done throughout. > > > + if (cper_notifier) > > + cper_notifier(&data); > > + up_read(&cxl_cper_rw_sem); > > +} > > + > > +void cxl_cper_register_notifier(cxl_cper_notifier notifier) > > +{ > > + down_write(&cxl_cper_rw_sem); > > guard(rwsem_write)(&cxl_cper_rw_sem); > > > + cper_notifier = notifier; > > I would enforce that there is only one registrant and explicitly fail > attempts to assign more than one. Done. > > > + up_write(&cxl_cper_rw_sem); > > +} > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(cxl_cper_register_notifier, CXL); > > + > > +void cxl_cper_unregister_notifier(void) > > +{ > > + down_write(&cxl_cper_rw_sem); > > guard(rwsem_write)(&cxl_cper_rw_sem); > > > + cper_notifier = NULL; > > This could enforce that the same callback specified at registration time > must also be passed at unregistration to disallow anonymous > unregistration. > > Makes the code self documenting that the registrant is a singleton, and > that unregistration must precede the next registration. But what do we do if it does not match? Returning an error will be ignored by the cxl_pci_driver_exit() and if we enforce the singleton in the registration I don't see a lot of room for error here. [snip] > > diff --git a/include/linux/cxl-event.h b/include/linux/cxl-event.h > > index 18dab4d90dc8..c764ff877a6d 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/cxl-event.h > > +++ b/include/linux/cxl-event.h > > @@ -108,4 +108,55 @@ struct cxl_event_record_raw { > > union cxl_event event; > > } __packed; > > > > +enum cxl_event_type { > > + CXL_CPER_EVENT_GEN_MEDIA, > > + CXL_CPER_EVENT_DRAM, > > + CXL_CPER_EVENT_MEM_MODULE, > > +}; > > + > > +#pragma pack(1) > > Looks like there is usage of __packed a few lines up, just pick > one-style. Prefer __packed vs #pragma when only a small handful of > structures need annotation as that is easier to check for correctness in > patch form. Ok I'll change it. Smita requested the use of pragma but keeping the __packed is redundant right now. And I'll go with your preference of __packed. Ira