On 10.12.23 08:30, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > On 12/10/23 14:15, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: [...] >> [1] This is why: You just added Ard and Boris to the CC, but did not >> make it obvious *why* they should care about that mail. They (and all >> the other recipients) for sure will have no idea what a1b87d54f4e45f >> exactly is, so you should have mentioned the commit summary. And doing >> that after a big quote makes it worse, as many people now need to scroll >> down to see if that mails contains something that might be relevant for >> them -- and just a waste of time if not. >> >> Furthermore, sending the first mail of the thread to all those people >> and lists was likely not very wise, as nobody is likely to care in a >> case like this. And not removing all those people and lists in the >> second mail of the thread make it a lot worse, as it became clear that >> many people and list do not care about it now that the regression was >> bisected. Hence it's best to remove them, we all get enough mail already. >> >> All that makes people ignore mails from you -- and maybe about >> regression tracking in general. :-( > > Oops, I didn't greet additional Cc's as you mentioned (that's my > tendency when handling regressions). Well, yes, but as mentioned that is just one of several things that were slightly off. > So maybe we continue tracking this on Bugzilla or keeping on ML or > both? Not sure what you mean. I'll reply in private, no need to bother the others with even more mail. BTW: Ard, I noticed you got involved in the ticket. Thx for that! Ciao, Thorsten
