Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] efi/loongarch: load address is not equal to link address

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:19 PM Ainux Wang <ainux.wang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxx> 于2023年12月5日周二 15:41写道:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 2:24 PM Ainux Wang <ainux.wang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxx> 于2023年12月5日周二 14:18写道:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 2:16 PM Ainux Wang <ainux.wang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxx> 于2023年12月5日周二 14:09写道:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Why send a test patch?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Confirm the accuracy of the testing method
> > > >
> > > > Don't use maillist to do this.
> > >
> > > Sorry, I don't know about this :-(
> > But from this patch, you only test the vmlinux.efi not loaded at link
> > address, but haven't tested the vmlinuz.efi not decompressed to the
> > link address. You should test that, but don't submit patches for that.
>
> vmlinuz.efi decompress at 0x300000  is ok.
Then you can resend the first patch as v4, add:
Acked-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxxx>


Huacai

>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 2:04 PM <wangyao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > From: Wang Yao <wangyao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This is a test patch for PIE kernel that load address is not equal to
> > > > > > > link address.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Wang Yao <wangyao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > >  drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/loongarch-stub.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> > > > > > >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/loongarch-stub.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/loongarch-stub.c
> > > > > > > index d6ec5d4b8dbe..c13c022d18cf 100644
> > > > > > > --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/loongarch-stub.c
> > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/loongarch-stub.c
> > > > > > > @@ -22,12 +22,22 @@ efi_status_t handle_kernel_image(unsigned long *image_addr,
> > > > > > >                                  efi_handle_t image_handle)
> > > > > > >  {
> > > > > > >         efi_status_t status;
> > > > > > > -       unsigned long kernel_addr = 0;
> > > > > > > +       unsigned long kernel_addr = 0, tmp_addr = 0;
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >         kernel_addr = (unsigned long)&kernel_offset - kernel_offset;
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +       /*
> > > > > > > +        * Allocate 2M space at 0x200000(EFI_KIMG_PREFERRED_ADDRESS) for
> > > > > > > +        * test, this will lead to the kernel be loaded at 0x4000000.
> > > > > > > +        */
> > > > > > > +       status = efi_relocate_kernel(&tmp_addr, 0x100000, 0x200000,
> > > > > > > +                    EFI_KIMG_PREFERRED_ADDRESS, efi_get_kimg_min_align(), 0x0);
> > > > > > > +       efi_info("@@@[%s] tmp_addr: 0x%lx\n", __func__, tmp_addr);
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > +       /* kernel_addr == 0x400000 */
> > > > > > >         status = efi_relocate_kernel(&kernel_addr, kernel_fsize, kernel_asize,
> > > > > > >                      EFI_KIMG_PREFERRED_ADDRESS, efi_get_kimg_min_align(), 0x0);
> > > > > > > +       efi_info("@@@[%s] kernel_addr: 0x%lx\n", __func__, kernel_addr);
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >         *image_addr = kernel_addr;
> > > > > > >         *image_size = kernel_asize;
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > 2.27.0
> > > > > > >





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux